Russia doesn’t intend to go to warfare with Ukraine: this was the basic sign that French President Emmanuel Macron transmitted from Moscow to Kiev. Over the previous two weeks, Macron has been actively concerned in resolving Europe’s escalating safety disaster. First, he met with Russian President Vladimir Putin, recognizing Moscow’s pursuits, after which with Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky, thanking him for his need to implement the Minsk deal, Izvestia writes. Nonetheless, the precise check of how efficient this diplomatic marathon seems can be on February 10, when the Normandy 4’s political advisers convene in Berlin.
Macron knowledgeable Zelensky that Russia has no intention of escalating the battle in Ukraine and that diplomacy is the one choice to resolve the scenario, emphasizing that there isn’t any different to the Minsk agreements. Moscow has incessantly urged Germany and France, the Normandy format’s mediators, to steer Ukraine to observe the Minsk deal. In line with Izvestia, it’s unclear whether or not Macron’s go to to Kiev needs to be seen as this form of “affect”.
Benoit Simian, a member of the French Nationwide Meeting fee on protection, instructed the newspaper that Macron’s go to to Russia is the beginning of a tough diplomatic dance that may happen within the coming days. In line with him, the present diplomatic disaster over submarines and the event of the AUKUS alliance have demonstrated that France’s overseas coverage strategies should be remodeled.
The French chief positively wants overseas coverage victories now, because the nation’s presidential elections are on the horizon in April, the newspaper writes. In line with Izvestia, the French political institution typically welcomes the president’s initiative and considers it logical.
Vice President of the Committee on Overseas Affairs, Protection and Armed Forces within the French Senate Joël Guerriau instructed the newspaper that France’s EU presidency, its participation within the Normandy 4, and NATO membership are three the reason why Macron is diplomatically concerned in resolving the Ukrainian disaster, whereas Ukraine’s proximity to the EU and Russia signifies that either side’ positions are taken under consideration.
A delegation from the State Division and the US Treasury is leaving for Europe to debate deliberate sanctions which can be to be imposed in opposition to Russia. In line with Nezavisimaya Gazeta, the West is torn between desirous to punish the Kremlin and wanting to barter. The go to comes amid reviews of progress in European safety discussions, with French President Emmanuel Macron claiming to be the peacemaker who can attain a cope with each Moscow and Kiev on Ukraine.
The mission is technical in nature, based on US Division of State spokesperson Ned Value, and its goal is to coordinate the sanctions technique of the US and its allies. The truth that such a mission is being carried out is no surprise, however the US mission to Europe presently seems to be making an attempt to reconcile two choices which can be scheduled to be made quickly, the newspaper writes.
Influencing Russia can be a sizzling matter in Congress within the foreseeable future. The Senate is presently debating a brand new invoice on sanctions. Senator Bob Menendez, one of many people behind it, stated that the doc is sort of completed, however there isn’t any readability on two essential facets: Nord Stream 2 and the timing of sanctions.
Then again, Menendez himself bluntly admitted that the Biden administration doesn’t need anti-Russian sanctions to be launched preemptively, the newspaper writes. The White Home’s dedication to stop early punishment of Russia could possibly be strengthened after the latest information from Moscow. In line with media reviews, throughout his go to to Russia, French President Emmanuel Macron achieved an settlement with Russian President Vladimir Putin to de-escalate the scenario in Ukraine.
The brand new version of the Army Doctrine of the Union State was permitted by Presidents Vladimir Putin of Russia and Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus again in November, however the content material of the doc turned public solely just lately. In line with Kommersant, in comparison with the 2001 doctrine, the brand new doc lists many extra components that negatively have an effect on the safety of the union of each international locations. Nonetheless, opposite to NATO’s fears, it doesn’t explicitly say that Russian nuclear weapons will be stationed on Belarusian soil.
The 19-page doc specifies that the military-political scenario growing across the Union State is characterised by rising unfavorable processes in international and regional safety, precipitated each by the geopolitical rivalry between the main world powers and by a conflict of pursuits of particular person states. In comparison with the 2001 doctrine, the variety of components threatening the safety of the Union State members has expanded significantly. In line with Kommersant, a number of of those threats have been referenced by Russian authorities as respectable causes for his or her demand that the US and NATO present safety assurances to Moscow.
That stated, the brand new pact states that Russia and Belarus are dedicated to resolving points by political and non-military means. Army pressure is taken into account to be a final resort solely when all different non-military choices have been exhausted.
The textual content confused that Russian nuclear weapons will proceed to play an vital position in averting nuclear and traditional armed engagements. America and its NATO companions are deeply involved concerning the probability of Russian nuclear weapons being stationed on Belarusian territory. Nonetheless, the brand new Army Doctrine of the Union State doesn’t explicitly state that Russian nuclear weapons will be deployed wherever past the Russian Federation, based on Kommersant.
Conducting all cryptocurrency transactions by Russian banks, licensing operators of such transactions, introducing limits for unqualified traders, figuring out digital foreign money house owners, and different measures to legalize crypto in Russia are contained within the idea of the Ministry of Finance, permitted by the federal government on February 7. Now the Ministry, along with the Financial institution of Russia, should submit the invoice to the federal government by February 18. Having permitted the idea, the federal government formally sided with those that advocated regulating the cryptocurrency, and never banning it, specialists instructed Izvestia.
In line with skilled information from the Ministry of Finance, the sum of money Russians (their quantity exceeds 12 mln) have in cryptocurrency wallets involves about 2 trillion rubles ($26.72 bln), with Russia rating third on the planet when it comes to mining digital property.
Deputy Head of the State Duma Working Group on Cryptocurrency Regulation Andrey Lugovoy instructed Izvestia that he supported the federal government’s choice. “For my part, it is a sensation. The permitted idea proposed by the Ministry of Finance helps cryptocurrency. People can personal and get rid of it as they see match. However on the similar time, will probably be legalized as a lot as attainable, recognized, and taxes needs to be paid from its turnover,” he stated.
Credit score establishments have already got a developed system for figuring out and monitoring monetary transactions, and utilizing it for cryptocurrency transactions is a logical transfer, head of Raiffeisenbank’s consumer division Kirill Matveev instructed the newspaper. In his opinion, regardless of vital prices, the introduction of such a mechanism by the financial institution will take not more than a 12 months.
Russian President Vladimir Putin chaired a gathering of the Council for Science and Schooling on Science Day. In line with the Kremlin press service earlier, the occasion was devoted to implementing an important modern initiatives – specifically, monitoring local weather change and growing low-carbon vitality. In line with Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Russia may want to maneuver in the direction of the “inexperienced agenda” extra actively by introducing a tax on hydrocarbon emissions. Scientists imagine that it will assist the nation transfer in the direction of larger charges of improvement.
On the one hand, Russia has signed the Paris Settlement and helps the worldwide local weather agenda, alternatively, it has entered a small membership of nations which can be negotiating the fitting to maneuver to carbon neutrality not from 2050, like most international locations, however ten years later, the newspaper writes. In the meantime, Russia plans to create its personal international local weather mannequin, Financial Growth Minister Maxim Reshetnikov stated in January. The EU’s proposed border carbon regulation would hurt Russia’s commerce with the EU, he added.
There are two methods to make using fossil fuels liable for vital greenhouse gasoline emissions unprofitable – to introduce quotas for CO2 emissions or a tax. Russia might think about the second possibility extra preferable.
Specialists instructed Nezavisimaya Gazeta that introducing such a tax is a step in the fitting path, however this alone will not be sufficient, decisive steps are wanted.
TASS will not be liable for the fabric quoted in these press opinions.